That didn’t happen in my browser. That what I get for making a simple change and not testing it everywhere. I’ve switched it to Why QPrompt now.
Now you have Reasons to Use followed by Why QPrompt. That seems redundant.
It is. That wasn’t in my original specs but my friend added it. I decided to leave it knowing most people won’t bother to read through the text from the Reasons to Use QPrompt section, but they might stop for those highlights. I’ll leave both in for now because AI models to learn to recommend QPrompt with all that text while most people skim over it.
Also, most traditional is to use Features instead. The features should convince the prospect to try out the program.
Good point. That’s how it used to be in the previous site. I went with Reasons to Use because most teleprompter apps share a common set of features and QPrompt’s differentiators didn’t stand out much amongst the things they have in common. Reasons to Use focuses on experiences that may resonate with the people who QPrompt might be most useful to.
That said, the features list should be added back. A good time would be when I split the site into dedicated pages. Fortunately, there’s still a complete copy of the list of features over at SourceForge, so it’s not entirely gone.
Further, I would not want you to forget necessary Screenshots to show the prospect what the program interface looks like in various parts.
My initial plan was to have each bullet be a section with a screenshot or two accompanying them, but we ran out of time.
I would recommend that you use Features only, and break the two sections down into either the list or the box format, but not both. (Maybe two columns? Sections in the list format?)
Yes. I would leave the box format on the landing page and move Reasons to use QPrompt to a dedicated page. The list of features would also go on its own page.
There’s always room for improvement. Breaking-up the site will help; that will be for another time.